Buy the book

Super Thinking

about

Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy

quote

Defining a hypothesis up front helps to avoid the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. This model is named after a joke about a person who comes upon a barn with targets drawn on the side and bullet holes in the middle of each target. He is amazed at the shooter's accuracy, only to find that the targets were drawn around the bullet holes after the shots were fired.

From

Chapter:

Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics

Section:

To Believe Or Not Believe

wikipedia page
Anecdotal evidence
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
Confounding Factor
Hypothesis
Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy
Randomized Controlled Experiment
A/B Testing
Observer-Expectancy Bias
Placebo Effect
Proxy
Selection Bias
Survivorship Bias
Response Bias
Law Of Large Numbers
Gambler's Fallacy
Clustering Illusion
Regression To The Mean
Median
Mode
Variance
Standard Deviation
Normal Distribution
Probability Distribution
Central Limit Theorem
Confidence Interval
Conditional Probability
Base Rate Fallacy
Bayes' Theorem
Frequentist
Bayesian
False Positive
False Negative
Power
Nuyll Hypothesis
Statistical Significance
P-Value
Replication Crisis
Data Dredging
Publication BIas
Systematic Review
Meta-Analyses
Pro-Con List
Maslow's Hammer
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Inflation
Sensitivity Analysis
Garbage In, Garbage Out
Decision Tree
Expected Value
Utility Values
Utilitarianism
Black Swan Events
Fat-Tailed Distributions
Systems Thinking
Chatelier's principle
Hysteresis
Monte Carlo Simulation
Local Optimum
Global Optimum
Unknown Unknowns
Scenario Analysis
Thought Experiment
Counterfactual Thinking
Lateral Thinking
Groupthink
Bandwagon Effect
Divergent Thinking
Convergent Thinking
Crowdsource
Prediction Market
Superforecasters
Business Case
prev
next